Internet content filtering is growing but Internet surveillance is growing even more.
Censors prefer to monitor dissidents’ online activities and contacts rather than try to prevent them from going online.
–RSF category and are classified as such if they demonstrate a capacity to censor news and information online, but also for their almost systematic repression of Internet users: Bahrain, Belarus, Burma, China (excluding Hong Kong and Macau), Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Vietnam.
The fourteen countries listed under the category are those that actively monitor, report and/or have in place frameworks that encourage ISPs to report on their subscribers’ Internet activities: Australia, Egypt, Eritrea, France, India, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Russia, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates.
Some of the world’s most repressive regimes are (ab)using technologies developed, and in most cases sold to them, by Western corporations.Even demonstrating, using Hurvitz's careful methodology of distribution-opposition-external attestation (as discussed below), that a particular linguistic feature is LBH does not lead to the classification of the text in which it is found as LBH.But others will not find this agreeable, so we will offer a way out of this conclusion by arguing that the presuppositions of the chronological approach are undermined by the evidence.After winning BGT and seeing her debut album top the charts, Susan bought the four-bedroom ex-council house in Blackburn, in which she still lives now, for £65,000.#Wine Wednesday - #Canada Wine Gay Dar goes off for " #Sonoma, The Gay Wine Capital of California" in today's #Toronto Daily Xtra.To enhance their surveillance abilities, repressive regimes turn to specialized companies for ever more effective equipment and software for filtering, monitoring and Deep Packet Inspection. , an Italian company for its cooperation with the Assad regime (Reporters sans Frontiers, 2012).